When James and Marco's adoption agency asked for apostilled FBI background checks, the hardest part wasn't the fingerprints — it was figuring out which government office actually issues the apostille.
James and Marco were several months into their adoption dossier for a child in Colombia when their agency sent back a checklist item that stopped them cold: apostilled FBI background checks, both parents. They had already submitted fingerprints and received their FBI Identity History Summaries in the mail. What they didn’t know was where those results needed to go next — a state office, a federal office, or somewhere else entirely — or how much a timing mistake could cost them in agency delays.
Their situation is common among intercountry adoption families, and it sits at the intersection of two things that are easy to confuse: who issues an apostille for a federal document, and whether the destination country even accepts an apostille at all. Colombia is a Hague Apostille Convention member, which simplified their path considerably — but only once they understood the correct process.
What an FBI Identity History Summary Actually Is
An FBI Identity History Summary — sometimes called an FBI background check — is a summary of records collected by the FBI based on fingerprint submissions, covering arrests, federal employment, naturalization, and military service where applicable. It is a federal record, produced by a federal agency. Adoption agencies routinely require one for each prospective parent as part of a home study and, later, the adoption dossier itself. Details on how to request a summary, and the accepted submission channels (including FBI-approved channelers), are published by the FBI’s Identity History Summary Checks page.
Why the Federal vs. State Distinction Matters
This is where many adoptive families stumble, and it was James and Marco’s first question. Because the FBI Identity History Summary is issued by a federal agency, it cannot be apostilled by a state Secretary of State. Only the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Authentications can apply an apostille (or, for non-Hague destinations, a certification preceding embassy legalization) to a document issued by a federal entity. Sending an FBI-issued document to a state apostille office is one of the most common reasons adoption paperwork gets returned or delayed.
Is Colombia a Hague Apostille Country?
The second question — and arguably the more consequential one — is whether the destination country even accepts an apostille. Colombia is a member of the Hague Apostille Convention, which means a properly issued U.S. Department of State apostille on the FBI Identity History Summary is sufficient for it to be recognized by Colombian authorities — no embassy or consular legalization step is required. Because Hague membership and each country’s entry-into-force date can change, families and agencies should always confirm current status directly on the HCCH status table rather than relying on secondhand information, especially since adoption authorities sometimes update accepted procedures.
Had Colombia not been a Hague member, the correct process would have been embassy or consular legalization — a distinct, multi-step process that is not the same as an apostille and should never be described as one.
The Document Path, Step by Step
For James and Marco, once the federal-versus-state question was resolved, the process followed a predictable sequence:
-
Request the FBI Identity History Summary
Each parent submits fingerprints and a request to the FBI, or through an approved channeler, per the FBI’s official guidance.
-
Receive the original summary
The FBI returns the Identity History Summary directly to the requester. This is the document that will be authenticated — copies or scans are not accepted for apostille.
-
Submit to the U.S. Department of State Office of Authentications
Because the issuing authority is federal, the document goes to the Office of Authentications in Washington, D.C., not a state apostille office.
-
Deliver the apostilled document to the adoption agency
The apostilled Identity History Summary is compiled into the adoption dossier alongside other required, apostilled records, timed to the adoption agency’s and Colombian authority’s stated validity window.
The Recency Problem: Timing the Apostille to the Dossier
The other detail that worried James and Marco was recency. Adoption authorities — including Colombia’s central adoption authority and the couple’s placing agency — frequently specify that background checks and their apostilles must be dated within a defined window before dossier submission. An apostille itself does not expire, but if it is issued too far in advance of the adoption filing, the receiving authority may treat the underlying document as stale and request a fresh FBI check and a new apostille.
Because these windows are set by the adoption agency and the receiving country’s authority — not by the U.S. Department of State — couples should confirm the exact acceptable date range directly with their agency and, where applicable, Colombia’s adoption authority before initiating the FBI request. James and Marco worked backward from their agency’s dossier submission date, timing the fingerprinting, FBI processing, and apostille steps so nothing would need to be redone.
Federal vs. State Document Authentication at a Glance
| Document Type | Issuing Authority | Who Apostilles It |
|---|---|---|
| FBI Identity History Summary | Federal Bureau of Investigation | U.S. Department of State |
| State-issued birth certificate | State vital records office | That state’s Secretary of State |
| Federal court order or federal agency letter | Federal court / federal agency | U.S. Department of State |
| Document destined for a non-Hague country | Varies | Not an apostille — requires embassy/consular legalization |
2 Federal Checks
In James and Marco’s dossier, both parents’ FBI Identity History Summaries needed the same federal authentication path — a detail that made processing them together, on a coordinated timeline, more efficient than handling each individually.
How Federal Apostille Solves This Exact Situation
Federal Apostille specializes specifically in the category of documents James and Marco were navigating: records issued by federal authorities, including FBI Identity History Summaries, that require authentication by the U.S. Department of State rather than a state office. For adoption cases involving a Hague Convention country like Colombia, the service:
- Confirms which authentication path applies — U.S. Department of State apostille versus embassy legalization — based on the destination country’s current Hague status.
- Hand-processes federal documents through the Office of Authentications in Washington, D.C., avoiding the routing mistake of sending an FBI-issued document to a state apostille office.
- Accepts secure online submission with document upload and tracked handling, so parents can monitor each document’s status rather than mailing originals blind.
- Coordinates timing across both parents’ documents, which matters when an adoption agency has specified a recency window for the completed dossier.
Federal Apostille does not control — and cannot guarantee — U.S. Department of State processing times, nor does it set the recency requirements imposed by adoption agencies or Colombia’s adoption authority. Those requirements should always be confirmed directly with the agency and the receiving authority. What the service does control is accurate routing, correct handling of federally-issued originals, and clear tracking through the authentication process itself.
Key Takeaways
- FBI Identity History Summaries are federal documents and must be apostilled by the U.S. Department of State, never a state Secretary of State.
- Colombia is a Hague Apostille Convention member, so an apostille — not embassy legalization — satisfies adoption dossier requirements; always confirm current membership on the HCCH status table.
- Adoption agencies and Colombia’s adoption authority may require recently dated checks and apostilles — confirm the acceptable window before starting the FBI request.
- Routing a federal document to the wrong office is one of the most common causes of adoption dossier delay.
