Why an FBI Identity History Summary destined for Abu Dhabi can never be 'apostilled' alone — and the exact two-stage sequence that gets it accepted.
A public school teacher we’ll call Ms. R had just accepted a contract to teach at an international school in Abu Dhabi. Her offer letter included a routine but unfamiliar requirement: submit an FBI Identity History Summary, authenticated for use in the United Arab Emirates. She ordered her background check, received the result, and then hit a wall that trips up thousands of educators, nurses, and contractors relocating to the Gulf each year — the UAE is not a member of the Hague Apostille Convention, so no apostille, by itself, would ever be accepted there.
She had, understandably, assumed one government stamp would do the job. Instead, her document needed to move through two separate authorities in a specific order before the UAE would recognize it. This article walks through exactly what that sequence looks like, why it exists, and how it applies to anyone authenticating a federal document for a non-Hague destination.
An FBI Identity History Summary — commonly called an FBI background check — is a federal record compiled from fingerprint submissions and criminal history data held by the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division. Because it is issued by a federal agency, it is authenticated at the federal level, not by any state Secretary of State. The FBI’s Identity History Summary Checks page outlines how to request the record and, notably, how to have it certified so it is eligible for the authentication chain that follows.
This distinction matters enormously. Many first-time applicants assume any document gets apostilled through their state government, the way a birth certificate or notarized power of attorney might be. Federal documents — FBI checks, USDA export certificates, federal court judgments, documents signed by federal officials — instead go through the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Authentications in Washington, D.C.
The Hague Apostille Convention created a simplified, one-stamp authentication system among member countries: a single apostille issued by a competent authority is accepted in any other member country, with no further legalization needed. The United Arab Emirates is not currently a party to that convention. Hague membership does shift occasionally as countries accede, so before relying on this for any destination, readers should always confirm current status on the HCCH Apostille Section status table rather than assuming.
For a non-member country like the UAE, the correct process is not an apostille at all — it is embassy or consular legalization. That means the document must first be authenticated by the U.S. Department of State, and then separately legalized by the UAE Embassy or Consulate, which confirms the State Department’s seal and signature before the document is considered valid for use inside the UAE.
For Ms. R’s FBI Identity History Summary heading to Abu Dhabi, the sequence runs through two distinct government authorities, in strict order. Skipping ahead — for example, trying to go straight to the UAE Embassy — typically results in rejection, since the embassy is authenticating the State Department’s seal, not the original FBI document itself.
Request the record directly from the FBI, or through an FBI-approved channeler, per the process described on the FBI’s official page.
The original FBI document is submitted to the Office of Authentications, which affixes its certificate confirming the document’s federal origin. This is a federal-level authentication, not a state apostille.
Because the UAE is outside the Hague Convention, the State-Department-authenticated document must then go to the UAE Embassy (or a designated consulate) for legalization, which confirms recognition inside the UAE.
The fully legalized document is submitted to the school, the Ministry of Education, or whichever UAE entity requested it — typically as part of a work-visa or employment-license file.
For general background on how the department’s authentication process fits into the broader picture of U.S. document authentication, the Department of State’s records and authentications overview is a useful primary reference.
| Factor | Hague Member Destination | Non-Hague Destination (e.g., UAE) |
|---|---|---|
| Correct terminology | Apostille | Embassy/Consular Legalization |
| Number of authenticating authorities | One (issuing authority) | Two (U.S. Dept. of State, then destination country’s embassy/consulate) |
| Who authenticates federal documents | U.S. Department of State | U.S. Department of State, then foreign embassy |
| Verification source | HCCH status table | HCCH status table + destination embassy requirements |
Ms. R’s document ultimately required 2 separate government authentications before it was accepted by the UAE — a fact her school’s HR office had not clearly explained when it simply said ‘get it apostilled.’
This is precisely the kind of case Federal Apostille handles daily: a federally-issued document — an FBI Identity History Summary — that needs authentication by the U.S. Department of State followed by legalization for a non-Hague country. Because our team works directly with the Office of Authentications in Washington, D.C., we handle the federal-level stage in person rather than relying on mail-in queues, and we route the subsequent UAE Embassy legalization step correctly so documents aren’t rejected for being submitted out of sequence.
For a case like Ms. R’s, the practical service includes:
We do not control or guarantee U.S. Department of State or embassy processing times, and we always recommend clients confirm current country-specific requirements with the destination embassy, since legalization requirements can vary or change.